<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (2) TMI 113 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44488</link>
    <description>An assessee who had not claimed relief under Rule 56A(1) at the relevant time was considered eligible to seek that relief before the appropriate authority in accordance with law. The matter was remitted to the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise, with liberty to the assessee to make the necessary application for relief in respect of duty on the intermediate product.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 15:18:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83017" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (2) TMI 113 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44488</link>
      <description>An assessee who had not claimed relief under Rule 56A(1) at the relevant time was considered eligible to seek that relief before the appropriate authority in accordance with law. The matter was remitted to the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise, with liberty to the assessee to make the necessary application for relief in respect of duty on the intermediate product.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44488</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>