https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773150 Mandatory pre-deposit under the indirect tax appeal framework was required before the appeal could be entertained, but the earlier shortfall was later cured by deposit of the balance amount during the proceedings. Once that statutory compliance was completed, the basis for rejecting the appeal for want of pre-deposit no longer survived. The writ petition was allowed, the impugned order was quashed, and the appeal was restored to the appellate authority for disposal on merits in accordance with law. en-us Mon, 09 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 Jun 2025 08:29:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773150 Mandatory pre-deposit under the indirect tax appeal framework was required before the appeal could be entertained, but the earlier shortfall was later cured by deposit of the balance amount during the proceedings. Once that statutory compliance was completed, the basis for rejecting the appeal for want of pre-deposit no longer survived. The writ petition was allowed, the impugned order was quashed, and the appeal was restored to the appellate authority for disposal on merits in accordance with law. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 09 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773150