<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 1269 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773156</link>
    <description>Liquidated damages recovered for breach of contract were treated as compensation, not consideration for any service. Applying prior Tribunal decisions on similar facts, CESTAT held that such receipts do not fall within the scope of declared service under section 66E(e) of the Finance Act, 1994, and no service tax was payable on the amounts collected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2025 08:29:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=830132" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 1269 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773156</link>
      <description>Liquidated damages recovered for breach of contract were treated as compensation, not consideration for any service. Applying prior Tribunal decisions on similar facts, CESTAT held that such receipts do not fall within the scope of declared service under section 66E(e) of the Finance Act, 1994, and no service tax was payable on the amounts collected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773156</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>