<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (1) TMI 81 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44484</link>
    <description>Acetylene gas emerging in crude form during manufacture and consumed captively was considered for excise duty only if it was marketable or capable of being marketed, not merely because it fell within a tariff entry. The record lacked a clear finding on whether the gas, in the form in which it emerged, satisfied the marketability requirement. The matter was therefore remitted for a specific finding on that factual issue before excisability could be determined under the tariff item.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 14:22:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=83013" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (1) TMI 81 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44484</link>
      <description>Acetylene gas emerging in crude form during manufacture and consumed captively was considered for excise duty only if it was marketable or capable of being marketed, not merely because it fell within a tariff entry. The record lacked a clear finding on whether the gas, in the form in which it emerged, satisfied the marketability requirement. The matter was therefore remitted for a specific finding on that factual issue before excisability could be determined under the tariff item.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44484</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>