<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 1277 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773164</link>
    <description>MCPCB was held classifiable under Customs Tariff Item 85340000, as the Tribunal followed its earlier decision on identical facts and rejected classification under Tariff Item 94054090. The reclassification in the impugned order was found unsustainable, and classification was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2025 08:29:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=830124" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 1277 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773164</link>
      <description>MCPCB was held classifiable under Customs Tariff Item 85340000, as the Tribunal followed its earlier decision on identical facts and rejected classification under Tariff Item 94054090. The reclassification in the impugned order was found unsustainable, and classification was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773164</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>