<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (2) TMI 98 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44458</link>
    <description>A duty demand cannot extend beyond the period covered by the show cause notice, because doing so denies the assessee a fair opportunity to meet the liability and violates natural justice. The text also states that the earlier trade notice and tariff advice were binding on the department in relation to impure carbon dioxide not conforming to marketable grade or ISI specifications, and that where classification remained doubtful and two interpretations were possible, the construction favourable to the assessee had to prevail. On that basis, the departmental demand was not sustainable and the assessee&#039;s relief was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2014 11:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82987" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (2) TMI 98 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44458</link>
      <description>A duty demand cannot extend beyond the period covered by the show cause notice, because doing so denies the assessee a fair opportunity to meet the liability and violates natural justice. The text also states that the earlier trade notice and tariff advice were binding on the department in relation to impure carbon dioxide not conforming to marketable grade or ISI specifications, and that where classification remained doubtful and two interpretations were possible, the construction favourable to the assessee had to prevail. On that basis, the departmental demand was not sustainable and the assessee&#039;s relief was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44458</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>