<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 1161 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773048</link>
    <description>The Gauhati HC dismissed the bail application filed by petitioners arrested under NDPS Act. Petitioners claimed violation of Article 22(1) alleging non-communication of arrest grounds in writing. The court found that Section 47 BNSS notices served on arrest date contained specific grounds mentioning their involvement in possession/transportation of 3180.830 grams heroin and violation of Section 8(c) NDPS Act. Section 48 BNSS compliance was also established as notices were sent to relatives/friends in Manipur via speed post on the same day with telephonic intimation. The court held constitutional and statutory requirements were substantially complied with, petitioners failed to overcome Section 37 NDPS Act embargo, and rejected the bail application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2025 09:04:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=829847" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 1161 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773048</link>
      <description>The Gauhati HC dismissed the bail application filed by petitioners arrested under NDPS Act. Petitioners claimed violation of Article 22(1) alleging non-communication of arrest grounds in writing. The court found that Section 47 BNSS notices served on arrest date contained specific grounds mentioning their involvement in possession/transportation of 3180.830 grams heroin and violation of Section 8(c) NDPS Act. Section 48 BNSS compliance was also established as notices were sent to relatives/friends in Manipur via speed post on the same day with telephonic intimation. The court held constitutional and statutory requirements were substantially complied with, petitioners failed to overcome Section 37 NDPS Act embargo, and rejected the bail application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773048</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>