https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773069 In PMLA bail matters, the twin conditions in Section 45 operate as a mandatory but reasoned statutory restraint, not an absolute bar. The Court treated the embargo as inapplicable on the facts because the alleged laundering trail largely pre-dated the alleged predicate offence, with only a limited post-offence link. It further held that amounts remitted before the predicate offence date could not, by themselves, be treated as proceeds of crime for the prosecution, and that a co-accused's statement alone was not substantive evidence sufficient to justify continued custody. Regular bail was therefore granted subject to conditions. en-us Fri, 09 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Jun 2025 09:04:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773069 In PMLA bail matters, the twin conditions in Section 45 operate as a mandatory but reasoned statutory restraint, not an absolute bar. The Court treated the embargo as inapplicable on the facts because the alleged laundering trail largely pre-dated the alleged predicate offence, with only a limited post-offence link. It further held that amounts remitted before the predicate offence date could not, by themselves, be treated as proceeds of crime for the prosecution, and that a co-accused's statement alone was not substantive evidence sufficient to justify continued custody. Regular bail was therefore granted subject to conditions. Case-Laws Money Laundering Fri, 09 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773069