https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773071 Calcutta HC dismissed a writ petition challenging arrest and detention in a money laundering case. The court held that mandamus and certiorari were inappropriate remedies, citing Supreme Court precedent that habeas corpus is the proper recourse for challenging arrest and detention. Additionally, the petition was not maintainable as Calcutta HC rules require habeas corpus petitions to be filed before a Division Bench, not a single judge. The petition was dismissed on procedural grounds without examining the merits of whether arrest grounds were properly communicated to the accused. en-us Mon, 09 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Jun 2025 09:04:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773071 Calcutta HC dismissed a writ petition challenging arrest and detention in a money laundering case. The court held that mandamus and certiorari were inappropriate remedies, citing Supreme Court precedent that habeas corpus is the proper recourse for challenging arrest and detention. Additionally, the petition was not maintainable as Calcutta HC rules require habeas corpus petitions to be filed before a Division Bench, not a single judge. The petition was dismissed on procedural grounds without examining the merits of whether arrest grounds were properly communicated to the accused. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 09 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773071