https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773071 A writ petition framed as one for mandamus and certiorari was held not maintainable where the real challenge concerned arrest, detention and remand, which are ordinarily addressed through habeas corpus. The Court treated the reliefs as misconceived because the grievance was directed at continued custody rather than a fit case for the writs sought. It also noted that the High Court rules require a habeas corpus petition to be placed before a Division Bench, reinforcing that the proper remedy and forum were different from those invoked. The petition was therefore not entertained in its present form, and the requested reliefs were declined. en-us Mon, 09 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Jun 2025 09:04:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773071 A writ petition framed as one for mandamus and certiorari was held not maintainable where the real challenge concerned arrest, detention and remand, which are ordinarily addressed through habeas corpus. The Court treated the reliefs as misconceived because the grievance was directed at continued custody rather than a fit case for the writs sought. It also noted that the High Court rules require a habeas corpus petition to be placed before a Division Bench, reinforcing that the proper remedy and forum were different from those invoked. The petition was therefore not entertained in its present form, and the requested reliefs were declined. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 09 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773071