<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 1199 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773086</link>
    <description>Cash deposits in an assessee&#039;s credit card account were held to be sufficiently explained where confirmations showed that the amounts were made by concerned entities towards business expenditure and reimbursement of expenses incurred for business purposes. On examination of the material on record, the source of the deposits stood corroborated, so the addition under section 68 was not warranted and was directed to be deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2025 09:04:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=829809" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 1199 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773086</link>
      <description>Cash deposits in an assessee&#039;s credit card account were held to be sufficiently explained where confirmations showed that the amounts were made by concerned entities towards business expenditure and reimbursement of expenses incurred for business purposes. On examination of the material on record, the source of the deposits stood corroborated, so the addition under section 68 was not warranted and was directed to be deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773086</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>