<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 1203 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773090</link>
    <description>The Tribunal condoned a 424-day delay in filing an appeal, finding the reasons bona fide. It upheld the ex-parte assessment order due to the assessee&#039;s initial non-compliance but remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer. The remand was subject to the assessee paying Rs. 5,000 in costs and submitting documentary evidence, balancing procedural fairness with the need to discourage delay in legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2025 09:04:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=829805" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 1203 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773090</link>
      <description>The Tribunal condoned a 424-day delay in filing an appeal, finding the reasons bona fide. It upheld the ex-parte assessment order due to the assessee&#039;s initial non-compliance but remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer. The remand was subject to the assessee paying Rs. 5,000 in costs and submitting documentary evidence, balancing procedural fairness with the need to discourage delay in legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773090</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>