https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44449 Territorial jurisdiction under Article 226 depends on whether the cause of action, wholly or in part, arose within the Court's limits. As both the Tribunal's order and the original confiscation, duty and penalty orders were passed by authorities outside the High Court's territorial jurisdiction, the petitioner's registered office at Dehradun did not by itself confer jurisdiction. The writ petition was therefore not maintainable before the High Court and was dismissed without going into the merits. en-us Tue, 20 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 26 Jun 2010 12:20:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44449 Territorial jurisdiction under Article 226 depends on whether the cause of action, wholly or in part, arose within the Court's limits. As both the Tribunal's order and the original confiscation, duty and penalty orders were passed by authorities outside the High Court's territorial jurisdiction, the petitioner's registered office at Dehradun did not by itself confer jurisdiction. The writ petition was therefore not maintainable before the High Court and was dismissed without going into the merits. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 20 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44449