<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 1248 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773135</link>
    <description>The HC granted bail to the petitioner in an economic offence under the CGST Act, where the maximum sentence is five years. Following SC precedent in Vineet Jain, the court found no extraordinary circumstances to deny bail, given documentary evidence and absence of criminal antecedents. Bail was granted with strict conditions including passport deposit, travel restrictions, and cooperation requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2025 09:04:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=829760" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 1248 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773135</link>
      <description>The HC granted bail to the petitioner in an economic offence under the CGST Act, where the maximum sentence is five years. Following SC precedent in Vineet Jain, the court found no extraordinary circumstances to deny bail, given documentary evidence and absence of criminal antecedents. Bail was granted with strict conditions including passport deposit, travel restrictions, and cooperation requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773135</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>