<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (6) TMI 91 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44447</link>
    <description>Pending consideration of the petitioner&#039;s applications for interim relief and waiver, the authority was directed not to insist on deposit of the demanded amount or penalty. The applications were also required to be decided expeditiously, and the writ petitions were disposed of on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 12:16:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82976" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (6) TMI 91 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44447</link>
      <description>Pending consideration of the petitioner&#039;s applications for interim relief and waiver, the authority was directed not to insist on deposit of the demanded amount or penalty. The applications were also required to be decided expeditiously, and the writ petitions were disposed of on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44447</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>