<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 1250 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773137</link>
    <description>Service of notice under the GST law may be effected by making the notice available on the common portal, and Section 169 recognises this as a prescribed mode of service. Where notice is served through that statutory portal mechanism, service is sufficient for initiating or continuing proceedings under Section 73. A challenge based on alleged non-service by other means did not succeed because portal service satisfied the legal requirement, and the writ petition was not entertained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2025 09:04:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=829758" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 1250 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773137</link>
      <description>Service of notice under the GST law may be effected by making the notice available on the common portal, and Section 169 recognises this as a prescribed mode of service. Where notice is served through that statutory portal mechanism, service is sufficient for initiating or continuing proceedings under Section 73. A challenge based on alleged non-service by other means did not succeed because portal service satisfied the legal requirement, and the writ petition was not entertained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>