<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 1257 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773144</link>
    <description>HC ruled that wrongful ITC availment by poultry feed manufacturer did not constitute tax evasion. The court found the voluntary reversal of ITC through GST DRC 03 form, despite inadvertent errors in tax period specification, was valid. The recovery notice was quashed, and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication, emphasizing substance over technical form in GST compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2025 09:04:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=829751" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 1257 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773144</link>
      <description>HC ruled that wrongful ITC availment by poultry feed manufacturer did not constitute tax evasion. The court found the voluntary reversal of ITC through GST DRC 03 form, despite inadvertent errors in tax period specification, was valid. The recovery notice was quashed, and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication, emphasizing substance over technical form in GST compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773144</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>