<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 1258 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773145</link>
    <description>The Rajasthan HC granted bail to petitioner accused of operating 44 firms registered under other persons&#039; names, issuing fake invoices, and claiming fraudulent input tax credit causing GST evasion of Rs.26 crores. Despite substantial allegations supported by departmental investigation, the court noted petitioner&#039;s custody since March 25, 2025, trial not yet commenced with 46 prosecution witnesses pending examination indicating prolonged proceedings. Considering maximum punishment of five years imprisonment under Section 132 of 2017 Act and absence of extraordinary circumstances for bail rejection, court released petitioner on personal bond of Rs.1 lakh with two sureties of Rs.50,000 each.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2025 09:04:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=829750" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 1258 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773145</link>
      <description>The Rajasthan HC granted bail to petitioner accused of operating 44 firms registered under other persons&#039; names, issuing fake invoices, and claiming fraudulent input tax credit causing GST evasion of Rs.26 crores. Despite substantial allegations supported by departmental investigation, the court noted petitioner&#039;s custody since March 25, 2025, trial not yet commenced with 46 prosecution witnesses pending examination indicating prolonged proceedings. Considering maximum punishment of five years imprisonment under Section 132 of 2017 Act and absence of extraordinary circumstances for bail rejection, court released petitioner on personal bond of Rs.1 lakh with two sureties of Rs.50,000 each.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773145</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>