https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462384 The Tripura Judicial Service seniority scheme under the rota-quota principle was found inconsistent after the 5th Amendment Rules, 2013 changed the quota for normal promotion and limited departmental competitive examination, while Rule 18 continued to reflect the old rotation. The 7th Amendment Rules, 2018 corrected that omission, and the Court treated the defect as inadvertent and curative in nature. It held that the amended seniority provisions must operate from the date the quota change took effect, so seniority in Grade-I had to be refixed on the revised roster basis. Objections based on delay, non-joinder, and vested seniority rights were rejected, and the seniority list was required to be recast accordingly. en-us Mon, 17 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Jun 2025 20:22:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462384 The Tripura Judicial Service seniority scheme under the rota-quota principle was found inconsistent after the 5th Amendment Rules, 2013 changed the quota for normal promotion and limited departmental competitive examination, while Rule 18 continued to reflect the old rotation. The 7th Amendment Rules, 2018 corrected that omission, and the Court treated the defect as inadvertent and curative in nature. It held that the amended seniority provisions must operate from the date the quota change took effect, so seniority in Grade-I had to be refixed on the revised roster basis. Objections based on delay, non-joinder, and vested seniority rights were rejected, and the seniority list was required to be recast accordingly. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 17 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462384