<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (2) TMI 156 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44435</link>
    <description>Filtration, bleaching, centrifuging and deodorisation of Castor Oil (Commercial) into Castor Oil (BP) did not amount to manufacture for octroi purposes because the basic commodity remained castor oil and no new commercial article emerged. Under the octroi refund rules, refund was available where the imported goods had not changed their original form, condition or state of appearance by manufacture or otherwise, and any ambiguity in classification was resolved in favour of the assessee. The refund claim was also not barred by limitation or laches, as claims had been made within time and the final rejection occurred only later, with delay attributable to the Corporation&#039;s inaction. The octroi refund was therefore payable, with interest if delayed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 11:54:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82964" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (2) TMI 156 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44435</link>
      <description>Filtration, bleaching, centrifuging and deodorisation of Castor Oil (Commercial) into Castor Oil (BP) did not amount to manufacture for octroi purposes because the basic commodity remained castor oil and no new commercial article emerged. Under the octroi refund rules, refund was available where the imported goods had not changed their original form, condition or state of appearance by manufacture or otherwise, and any ambiguity in classification was resolved in favour of the assessee. The refund claim was also not barred by limitation or laches, as claims had been made within time and the final rejection occurred only later, with delay attributable to the Corporation&#039;s inaction. The octroi refund was therefore payable, with interest if delayed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44435</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>