https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89485 ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal against CIT's revision u/s 263. The tribunal found no jurisdictional defect as the assessee consistently responded to notices from ITO Panchkula without raising objections. The AO conducted limited scrutiny, sought explanations on unsecured loans and credit card payments, and was satisfied with the assessee's evidence. CIT's general observations lacked specific errors, and the assumption of complete scrutiny was incorrect. The tribunal held that CIT erroneously invoked section 263, thereby quashing the revisional order and upholding the original assessment. en-us Tue, 17 Jun 2025 07:57:58 +0530 Tue, 17 Jun 2025 07:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89485 ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal against CIT's revision u/s 263. The tribunal found no jurisdictional defect as the assessee consistently responded to notices from ITO Panchkula without raising objections. The AO conducted limited scrutiny, sought explanations on unsecured loans and credit card payments, and was satisfied with the assessee's evidence. CIT's general observations lacked specific errors, and the assumption of complete scrutiny was incorrect. The tribunal held that CIT erroneously invoked section 263, thereby quashing the revisional order and upholding the original assessment. Highlights Income Tax Tue, 17 Jun 2025 07:57:58 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89485