https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44426 The court set aside the order rejecting the petitioner's appeal, citing lack of reasoning and failure to apply legal tests. It emphasized the need for a well-reasoned order under Section 35F of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. Additionally, the court found a procedural flaw in the communication of the order to the petitioner, not complying with statutory requirements. The court directed the respondent to provide a personal hearing to the petitioner and dispose of the appeal within two months, stressing adherence to legal procedures and principles of natural justice. en-us Thu, 26 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 26 Jun 2010 11:32:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44426 The court set aside the order rejecting the petitioner's appeal, citing lack of reasoning and failure to apply legal tests. It emphasized the need for a well-reasoned order under Section 35F of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. Additionally, the court found a procedural flaw in the communication of the order to the petitioner, not complying with statutory requirements. The court directed the respondent to provide a personal hearing to the petitioner and dispose of the appeal within two months, stressing adherence to legal procedures and principles of natural justice. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 26 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44426