<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (4) TMI 129 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44424</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the appellants to import the goods subject to conditions: (i) Mutilation of 40% of the goods claimed to be copper wire, (ii) Submission of a bill of entry and payment of duty as copper scrap, (iii) Return of original shipment documents after mutilation. The order of the Adjudicating Authority was set aside, and no costs were imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 11:25:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82953" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (4) TMI 129 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44424</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the appellants to import the goods subject to conditions: (i) Mutilation of 40% of the goods claimed to be copper wire, (ii) Submission of a bill of entry and payment of duty as copper scrap, (iii) Return of original shipment documents after mutilation. The order of the Adjudicating Authority was set aside, and no costs were imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44424</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>