https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773035 Telangana HC dismissed writ petition challenging bank attachment order. Petitioner argued DRC-07 was not issued before Order-in-Original, claiming no need to challenge the original order. Court held that without challenging the Order-in-Original issued on 06.01.2022, no case existed for interference. Petition was filed beyond prescribed 60-day limitation period under Section 31 of 2005 Act. Citing SC precedent in Assistant Commissioner v. Glaxo Smith Kline, court ruled it cannot disregard statutory limitation periods when alternative efficacious remedies were available. Writ petition dismissed with no interference in bank attachment. en-us Wed, 09 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 Jun 2025 12:51:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773035 Telangana HC dismissed writ petition challenging bank attachment order. Petitioner argued DRC-07 was not issued before Order-in-Original, claiming no need to challenge the original order. Court held that without challenging the Order-in-Original issued on 06.01.2022, no case existed for interference. Petition was filed beyond prescribed 60-day limitation period under Section 31 of 2005 Act. Citing SC precedent in Assistant Commissioner v. Glaxo Smith Kline, court ruled it cannot disregard statutory limitation periods when alternative efficacious remedies were available. Writ petition dismissed with no interference in bank attachment. Case-Laws GST Wed, 09 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=773035