<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (12) TMI 55 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44417</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, ruling that the contract in question was not firm due to various alterations. The appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 11:02:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82946" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (12) TMI 55 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44417</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, ruling that the contract in question was not firm due to various alterations. The appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44417</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>