<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 1585 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462369</link>
    <description>The SC analyzed the legality of surcharge levied on income tax. The Tribunal found that since the appellant&#039;s total income was below Rs. 50 lakh, no surcharge should have been imposed. The 37% surcharge by the CIT(A) was deemed contrary to statutory provisions in the Finance Act. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleted the 37% surcharge, and held that surcharge is leviable only when income exceeds prescribed thresholds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2025 19:09:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=829457" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 1585 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462369</link>
      <description>The SC analyzed the legality of surcharge levied on income tax. The Tribunal found that since the appellant&#039;s total income was below Rs. 50 lakh, no surcharge should have been imposed. The 37% surcharge by the CIT(A) was deemed contrary to statutory provisions in the Finance Act. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleted the 37% surcharge, and held that surcharge is leviable only when income exceeds prescribed thresholds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462369</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>