<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 1077 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772964</link>
    <description>The SC/Tribunal partially allowed the tax appeal, deleting Rs. 2 crores in unsecured loan additions where cheques were dishonoured. The remaining Rs. 2,99,49,080/- was remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh verification of loan creditors. The decision emphasized the assessee&#039;s burden to prove loan genuineness under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, balancing procedural fairness with tax compliance requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2025 08:39:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=829335" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 1077 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772964</link>
      <description>The SC/Tribunal partially allowed the tax appeal, deleting Rs. 2 crores in unsecured loan additions where cheques were dishonoured. The remaining Rs. 2,99,49,080/- was remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh verification of loan creditors. The decision emphasized the assessee&#039;s burden to prove loan genuineness under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, balancing procedural fairness with tax compliance requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772964</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>