<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Bilateral Cash Loan Transaction Invalidates Tax Presumption Under Section 69D, Overturning Revenue&#039;s Disallowance Claim</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89439</link>
    <description>ITAT adjudicated a tax dispute regarding cash loan documentation. The tribunal determined that the contested document did not constitute a Hundi, as it represented a bilateral transaction and was not executed on traditional Hundi paper. Consequently, the statutory presumption under Section 69D was deemed inapplicable. Relying on precedential judicial interpretation, the tribunal rejected revenue&#039;s contention and found the disallowance under Section 69D unsustainable. The appellate tribunal ultimately allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, nullifying the challenged tax assessment based on procedural and documentary insufficiencies in characterizing the financial instrument as a Hundi.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2025 08:39:03 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2025 08:39:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=829305" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Bilateral Cash Loan Transaction Invalidates Tax Presumption Under Section 69D, Overturning Revenue&#039;s Disallowance Claim</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89439</link>
      <description>ITAT adjudicated a tax dispute regarding cash loan documentation. The tribunal determined that the contested document did not constitute a Hundi, as it represented a bilateral transaction and was not executed on traditional Hundi paper. Consequently, the statutory presumption under Section 69D was deemed inapplicable. Relying on precedential judicial interpretation, the tribunal rejected revenue&#039;s contention and found the disallowance under Section 69D unsustainable. The appellate tribunal ultimately allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, nullifying the challenged tax assessment based on procedural and documentary insufficiencies in characterizing the financial instrument as a Hundi.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2025 08:39:03 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89439</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>