<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (6) TMI 89 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44397</link>
    <description>The court found a violation of natural justice principles in adjudication proceedings under Section 124 of the Customs Act. The court set aside the order of adjudication due to the lack of opportunity for the writ petitioner to be heard before the final order was passed. The adjudicating authority was directed to allow the petitioner to respond to the show cause notice within a specified time frame and to conduct proceedings promptly, ensuring a fair hearing and a reasoned order. The court emphasized the importance of upholding natural justice principles and did not address the merits of the disputes, ultimately allowing the writ application with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 10:05:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82926" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (6) TMI 89 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44397</link>
      <description>The court found a violation of natural justice principles in adjudication proceedings under Section 124 of the Customs Act. The court set aside the order of adjudication due to the lack of opportunity for the writ petitioner to be heard before the final order was passed. The adjudicating authority was directed to allow the petitioner to respond to the show cause notice within a specified time frame and to conduct proceedings promptly, ensuring a fair hearing and a reasoned order. The court emphasized the importance of upholding natural justice principles and did not address the merits of the disputes, ultimately allowing the writ application with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44397</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>