<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 1040 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772927</link>
    <description>The SC reviewed a tax appeal involving ex-parte dismissal, reassessment proceedings, and unexplained cash deposits. The court set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order, restoring the appeal for fresh adjudication. Key holdings emphasized procedural fairness, requiring proper examination of merits, compliance with section 147, and opportunity for the assessee to explain cash deposits. The matter was remitted for reconsideration with a cost of Rs. 5,000 imposed on the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2025 08:38:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=829253" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 1040 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772927</link>
      <description>The SC reviewed a tax appeal involving ex-parte dismissal, reassessment proceedings, and unexplained cash deposits. The court set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order, restoring the appeal for fresh adjudication. Key holdings emphasized procedural fairness, requiring proper examination of merits, compliance with section 147, and opportunity for the assessee to explain cash deposits. The matter was remitted for reconsideration with a cost of Rs. 5,000 imposed on the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772927</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>