<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 1048 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772935</link>
    <description>ITAT Pune set aside CIT(A)/NFAC&#039;s ex-parte order for violating section 250(6) of the Income Tax Act. The appellate authority had merely concurred with the AO&#039;s order without examining the case merits independently. The tribunal found this approach contrary to statutory requirements and remanded the matter back to CIT(A)/NFAC for fresh adjudication with proper speaking order after providing reasonable hearing opportunity to parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2025 08:38:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=829245" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 1048 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772935</link>
      <description>ITAT Pune set aside CIT(A)/NFAC&#039;s ex-parte order for violating section 250(6) of the Income Tax Act. The appellate authority had merely concurred with the AO&#039;s order without examining the case merits independently. The tribunal found this approach contrary to statutory requirements and remanded the matter back to CIT(A)/NFAC for fresh adjudication with proper speaking order after providing reasonable hearing opportunity to parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772935</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>