https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772954 Delhi HC dismissed writ petition challenging order regarding fraudulent Input Tax Credit availment. Petitioner allegedly colluded with entities to claim substantial ITC benefits without actual goods/services sales, undermining GST regime's ITC facility. Court held fraudulent ITC cases involving exchequer burden should not ordinarily invoke writ jurisdiction given available statutory appeal remedy under Section 107 of CGST Act, 2017. Consolidated SCN issued for multiple financial years did not warrant extraordinary intervention. Petition dismissed as allegations required detailed factual inquiry unsuitable for writ proceedings, with adequate appellate remedy available. en-us Fri, 30 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 Jun 2025 08:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772954 Delhi HC dismissed writ petition challenging order regarding fraudulent Input Tax Credit availment. Petitioner allegedly colluded with entities to claim substantial ITC benefits without actual goods/services sales, undermining GST regime's ITC facility. Court held fraudulent ITC cases involving exchequer burden should not ordinarily invoke writ jurisdiction given available statutory appeal remedy under Section 107 of CGST Act, 2017. Consolidated SCN issued for multiple financial years did not warrant extraordinary intervention. Petition dismissed as allegations required detailed factual inquiry unsuitable for writ proceedings, with adequate appellate remedy available. Case-Laws GST Fri, 30 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772954