https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772957 The Karnataka HC dismissed a petition challenging a confiscation order under Section 130 of the KGST Act, ruling that an alternative efficacious remedy exists through appeal under Section 107 of the KGST Act. The court held the petition was not maintainable due to availability of statutory appellate remedy. The petitioner was granted liberty to approach the Appellate Authority for release of confiscated goods and vehicle, with direction that any such application be considered expeditiously within two weeks of filing. en-us Thu, 05 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 Jun 2025 08:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772957 The Karnataka HC dismissed a petition challenging a confiscation order under Section 130 of the KGST Act, ruling that an alternative efficacious remedy exists through appeal under Section 107 of the KGST Act. The court held the petition was not maintainable due to availability of statutory appellate remedy. The petitioner was granted liberty to approach the Appellate Authority for release of confiscated goods and vehicle, with direction that any such application be considered expeditiously within two weeks of filing. Case-Laws GST Thu, 05 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772957