<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 1071 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772958</link>
    <description>A tender condition requiring 18% GST on auction of human hair was inconsistent with the applicable exemption, because the Central Government notification exempted human hair, unworked whether or not washed, including waste of human hair. The HR&amp;CE circular also stated that no GST was payable on such auctions. Accordingly, clause 23 of the tender could not be enforced to compel auction participants to pay GST, and the condition was set aside to that extent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2025 08:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=829222" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 1071 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772958</link>
      <description>A tender condition requiring 18% GST on auction of human hair was inconsistent with the applicable exemption, because the Central Government notification exempted human hair, unworked whether or not washed, including waste of human hair. The HR&amp;CE circular also stated that no GST was payable on such auctions. Accordingly, clause 23 of the tender could not be enforced to compel auction participants to pay GST, and the condition was set aside to that extent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772958</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>