<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 1072 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772959</link>
    <description>Advance ruling orders were set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration in light of the Supreme Court decision in Safari Retreats and the retrospective amendment to the CGST law. The Authority for Advance Ruling must reconsider the dispute afresh in accordance with law, and both parties were permitted to place additional material before it. All contentions were left open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2025 08:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=829221" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 1072 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772959</link>
      <description>Advance ruling orders were set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration in light of the Supreme Court decision in Safari Retreats and the retrospective amendment to the CGST law. The Authority for Advance Ruling must reconsider the dispute afresh in accordance with law, and both parties were permitted to place additional material before it. All contentions were left open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772959</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>