https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772960 The HC ruled that the 6th respondent, who collected GST from the petitioner for commercial vehicle rental services, violated the Jharkhand GST Act by failing to file GSTR-01 returns and remit collected taxes. The court directed official respondents to initiate proceedings against the 6th respondent under Section 76 within eight weeks, imposed Rs. 100,000 in costs, and rejected the 6th respondent's claims of non-liability. The writ petition was deemed maintainable and not barred by res judicata. en-us Fri, 13 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 Jun 2025 08:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772960 The HC ruled that the 6th respondent, who collected GST from the petitioner for commercial vehicle rental services, violated the Jharkhand GST Act by failing to file GSTR-01 returns and remit collected taxes. The court directed official respondents to initiate proceedings against the 6th respondent under Section 76 within eight weeks, imposed Rs. 100,000 in costs, and rejected the 6th respondent's claims of non-liability. The writ petition was deemed maintainable and not barred by res judicata. Case-Laws GST Fri, 13 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772960