<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (10) TMI 98 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44389</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Central Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order on classification but deemed the duty demand from 1980 unenforceable due to timing issues. The appellant prevailed on classification but could not enforce the demand, resulting in the appeal being allowed with no costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2015 15:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82918" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (10) TMI 98 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44389</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Central Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order on classification but deemed the duty demand from 1980 unenforceable due to timing issues. The appellant prevailed on classification but could not enforce the demand, resulting in the appeal being allowed with no costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44389</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>