<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 1279 - ITAT AGRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462356</link>
    <description>ITAT Agra reduced adhoc disallowance of expenses from 7.5% to 5% after considering assessee&#039;s historical profit rate of 8%, rejecting standardized profit rates for similar activities. Regarding TDS disallowance under section 40(a)(ia), tribunal allowed Rs. 7,42,600 payment as individual amounts stayed below Rs. 1,20,000 threshold, supported by tax audit report confirming no TDS liability. However, confirmed disallowance of Rs. 2,10,400 water tax rent payment where assessee admitted non-compliance with TDS provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2025 18:30:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=829145" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 1279 - ITAT AGRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462356</link>
      <description>ITAT Agra reduced adhoc disallowance of expenses from 7.5% to 5% after considering assessee&#039;s historical profit rate of 8%, rejecting standardized profit rates for similar activities. Regarding TDS disallowance under section 40(a)(ia), tribunal allowed Rs. 7,42,600 payment as individual amounts stayed below Rs. 1,20,000 threshold, supported by tax audit report confirming no TDS liability. However, confirmed disallowance of Rs. 2,10,400 water tax rent payment where assessee admitted non-compliance with TDS provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462356</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>