<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (11) TMI 67 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44382</link>
    <description>SC held that Customs authorities retain power under Section 111(o) to investigate and confiscate imported goods where post-importation conditions of an Exemption Notification or import licence are breached, notwithstanding that the licensing authority may also investigate. The court found nothing in the Import/Export Policy or Handbook of Procedure removing or restricting Customs&#039; powers. A 1969 communication suggesting otherwise was not determinative. Appeal dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2025 18:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82911" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (11) TMI 67 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44382</link>
      <description>SC held that Customs authorities retain power under Section 111(o) to investigate and confiscate imported goods where post-importation conditions of an Exemption Notification or import licence are breached, notwithstanding that the licensing authority may also investigate. The court found nothing in the Import/Export Policy or Handbook of Procedure removing or restricting Customs&#039; powers. A 1969 communication suggesting otherwise was not determinative. Appeal dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44382</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>