<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (11) TMI 108 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT KARNATAKA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44380</link>
    <description>The court held that the Collector lacked jurisdiction to issue a third show-cause notice after previous adjudications favored the Company. The court found the third notice unjustified, as the reasons given had already been addressed in prior adjudications. Allegations of wilful misstatement and unjust enrichment were deemed false, with the court emphasizing the finality of decisions and rejecting the Department&#039;s attempt to bypass previous orders. The appeal was allowed, the judgment set aside, and the third show-cause notice quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 18:36:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82909" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (11) TMI 108 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT KARNATAKA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44380</link>
      <description>The court held that the Collector lacked jurisdiction to issue a third show-cause notice after previous adjudications favored the Company. The court found the third notice unjustified, as the reasons given had already been addressed in prior adjudications. Allegations of wilful misstatement and unjust enrichment were deemed false, with the court emphasizing the finality of decisions and rejecting the Department&#039;s attempt to bypass previous orders. The appeal was allowed, the judgment set aside, and the third show-cause notice quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44380</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>