<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 924 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772811</link>
    <description>The Bombay HC dismissed a petition challenging an assessment order where an appeal was pending. The petitioner had applied for stay of demands before the assessing officer but deliberately suppressed this material information from the court. The HC found the petition was filed to take chances with the judicial process, noting unexplained delay in filing and availability of alternate remedy through appeal. The court criticized such petitions for curtailing judicial time that could be used for genuine and old matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2025 16:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=829073" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 924 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772811</link>
      <description>The Bombay HC dismissed a petition challenging an assessment order where an appeal was pending. The petitioner had applied for stay of demands before the assessing officer but deliberately suppressed this material information from the court. The HC found the petition was filed to take chances with the judicial process, noting unexplained delay in filing and availability of alternate remedy through appeal. The court criticized such petitions for curtailing judicial time that could be used for genuine and old matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772811</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>