<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 931 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772818</link>
    <description>Prosecution under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act remains independent, but it still depends on a legally subsisting scheduled offence and proceeds of crime; where the predicate case ends only by abatement due to the sole accused&#039;s death, continuation of the money-laundering proceedings may still be maintainable. Restoration of attached property under Section 8(8) is available only to a bona fide claimant who proves a legitimate interest, good faith, and a quantifiable loss caused by money laundering. An assignee of receivables cannot rely on the original party&#039;s loss alone to satisfy that requirement. On this analysis, attachment is not automatically lifted and restoration depends on strict compliance with the statutory and rule-based criteria.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2025 06:47:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=829066" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 931 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772818</link>
      <description>Prosecution under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act remains independent, but it still depends on a legally subsisting scheduled offence and proceeds of crime; where the predicate case ends only by abatement due to the sole accused&#039;s death, continuation of the money-laundering proceedings may still be maintainable. Restoration of attached property under Section 8(8) is available only to a bona fide claimant who proves a legitimate interest, good faith, and a quantifiable loss caused by money laundering. An assignee of receivables cannot rely on the original party&#039;s loss alone to satisfy that requirement. On this analysis, attachment is not automatically lifted and restoration depends on strict compliance with the statutory and rule-based criteria.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772818</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>