<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (9) TMI 135 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44377</link>
    <description>The court directed the petitioner to respond to the show cause notice within a specified timeframe, preserving their right to challenge the adequacy of the notices served on individual directors. The respondents were instructed to conclude the adjudication proceedings promptly, considering the prolonged pendency of the matter. The court ordered the petitioner to submit a reply to the show cause notice within two weeks and directed the respondents to make a determination on compliance with Section 110 within four weeks. The judgment emphasized the need for expeditious resolution and left all contentions open for further consideration, ultimately dismissing related applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 18:28:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82906" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (9) TMI 135 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44377</link>
      <description>The court directed the petitioner to respond to the show cause notice within a specified timeframe, preserving their right to challenge the adequacy of the notices served on individual directors. The respondents were instructed to conclude the adjudication proceedings promptly, considering the prolonged pendency of the matter. The court ordered the petitioner to submit a reply to the show cause notice within two weeks and directed the respondents to make a determination on compliance with Section 110 within four weeks. The judgment emphasized the need for expeditious resolution and left all contentions open for further consideration, ultimately dismissing related applications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44377</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>