<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 939 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772826</link>
    <description>LIC premium payments were examined as a possible unexplained investment, but the documentary record supported the assessee&#039;s explanation that the funds came from retirement benefits and later cash received from I-Core Services Limited after dishonour of an earlier cheque. On those facts, the investment was not treated as unexplained, and the addition was deleted in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2025 06:47:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=829058" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 939 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772826</link>
      <description>LIC premium payments were examined as a possible unexplained investment, but the documentary record supported the assessee&#039;s explanation that the funds came from retirement benefits and later cash received from I-Core Services Limited after dishonour of an earlier cheque. On those facts, the investment was not treated as unexplained, and the addition was deleted in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772826</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>