<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 940 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772827</link>
    <description>Deduction of bonus expenditure under section 43B depends on proof of actual payment and supporting documents; where the record is incomplete, the matter must be verified by the assessing authority and the claim may be allowed on furnishing evidence. A further disallowance of interest under section 23 of the MSMED Act was held to be impermissible where the same amount had already been included in the assessee&#039;s own disallowance in the return, as that would create a double disallowance. The discussion therefore treats factual verification as essential for the bonus claim and rejects duplication of the same inadmissible expenditure in processing the return.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2025 06:47:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=829057" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 940 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772827</link>
      <description>Deduction of bonus expenditure under section 43B depends on proof of actual payment and supporting documents; where the record is incomplete, the matter must be verified by the assessing authority and the claim may be allowed on furnishing evidence. A further disallowance of interest under section 23 of the MSMED Act was held to be impermissible where the same amount had already been included in the assessee&#039;s own disallowance in the return, as that would create a double disallowance. The discussion therefore treats factual verification as essential for the bonus claim and rejects duplication of the same inadmissible expenditure in processing the return.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772827</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>