<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 941 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772828</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that a redevelopment agreement between a cooperative housing society and a builder does not constitute a property transfer for capital gains tax purposes. No actual transfer or possession change occurred, and the stamp duty valuation was not equivalent to received consideration. The Tribunal deleted the Assessing Officer&#039;s addition of Rs. 6,52,77,000/- as short-term capital gains, finding the transaction did not trigger tax liability under the Income-tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2025 06:47:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=829056" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 941 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772828</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that a redevelopment agreement between a cooperative housing society and a builder does not constitute a property transfer for capital gains tax purposes. No actual transfer or possession change occurred, and the stamp duty valuation was not equivalent to received consideration. The Tribunal deleted the Assessing Officer&#039;s addition of Rs. 6,52,77,000/- as short-term capital gains, finding the transaction did not trigger tax liability under the Income-tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772828</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>