<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 986 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772873</link>
    <description>The HC upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision confirming that the assessee trust is not engaged in any business activity under Section 2(15) and is therefore entitled to exemption under Section 11. The CIT(A) and ITAT both found no involvement of the trust in transactions between inter se members, rendering the proviso to Section 2(15) inapplicable. The HC held that the ITAT&#039;s fact-based conclusion does not raise any substantial question of law, affirming the exemption claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2025 11:26:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=829011" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 986 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772873</link>
      <description>The HC upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision confirming that the assessee trust is not engaged in any business activity under Section 2(15) and is therefore entitled to exemption under Section 11. The CIT(A) and ITAT both found no involvement of the trust in transactions between inter se members, rendering the proviso to Section 2(15) inapplicable. The HC held that the ITAT&#039;s fact-based conclusion does not raise any substantial question of law, affirming the exemption claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772873</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>