<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 989 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772876</link>
    <description>The SC examined procedural irregularities in a GST assessment, finding that conducting a personal hearing before the submission of a reply violates statutory provisions. The court set aside the assessment order of Rs. 71,57,938/- and remanded the matter to the Revenue Authority to restart proceedings from the show-cause notice stage, emphasizing strict adherence to procedural fairness under Sections 73, 74, and 75 of the GST Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2025 06:47:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=829008" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 989 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772876</link>
      <description>The SC examined procedural irregularities in a GST assessment, finding that conducting a personal hearing before the submission of a reply violates statutory provisions. The court set aside the assessment order of Rs. 71,57,938/- and remanded the matter to the Revenue Authority to restart proceedings from the show-cause notice stage, emphasizing strict adherence to procedural fairness under Sections 73, 74, and 75 of the GST Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772876</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>