<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 991 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772878</link>
    <description>Retrospective cancellation of GST registration was challenged on the ground that the cancellation was based on a suspicious transaction with another trading entity. The petitioner sought early disposal of the pending revocation application, and the respondent raised no objection. The HC directed that the revocation application against the impugned cancellation order be decided within one month from the date of the order and that the decision be communicated to the petitioner. The petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2025 06:47:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=829006" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 991 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772878</link>
      <description>Retrospective cancellation of GST registration was challenged on the ground that the cancellation was based on a suspicious transaction with another trading entity. The petitioner sought early disposal of the pending revocation application, and the respondent raised no objection. The HC directed that the revocation application against the impugned cancellation order be decided within one month from the date of the order and that the decision be communicated to the petitioner. The petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772878</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>