<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 995 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772882</link>
    <description>Bail granted in a GST prosecution will not be cancelled absent supervening circumstances, misuse of liberty, or other compelling grounds showing continued release is unjustified. The court noted that no criminal complaint had been filed despite a long-pending investigation, and there was no allegation that the accused had misused bail. It also considered that the accused had deposited a substantial amount with the department and had undertaken to cooperate with the investigation, avoid tampering with evidence, and not influence witnesses. On that record, there was no sufficient basis to interfere with the bail order, and the cancellation request was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2025 06:47:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=829002" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 995 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772882</link>
      <description>Bail granted in a GST prosecution will not be cancelled absent supervening circumstances, misuse of liberty, or other compelling grounds showing continued release is unjustified. The court noted that no criminal complaint had been filed despite a long-pending investigation, and there was no allegation that the accused had misused bail. It also considered that the accused had deposited a substantial amount with the department and had undertaken to cooperate with the investigation, avoid tampering with evidence, and not influence witnesses. On that record, there was no sufficient basis to interfere with the bail order, and the cancellation request was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772882</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>