<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 1001 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772888</link>
    <description>The writ petition was disposed of by the HC, with the petitioner given liberty to pursue the statutory appellate remedy. Any appeal filed within the stipulated period is to be considered by the appellate authority together with an application for condonation of delay. The operative effect is that the dispute was not decided on merits in writ jurisdiction, and the petitioner was left to seek relief before the designated appellate forum through the prescribed statutory process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2025 06:47:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=828996" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 1001 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772888</link>
      <description>The writ petition was disposed of by the HC, with the petitioner given liberty to pursue the statutory appellate remedy. Any appeal filed within the stipulated period is to be considered by the appellate authority together with an application for condonation of delay. The operative effect is that the dispute was not decided on merits in writ jurisdiction, and the petitioner was left to seek relief before the designated appellate forum through the prescribed statutory process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772888</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>